Discover your potential savings with our ROI Calculator
Self-guided Product Tours
Product Demo Videos
Pricing
Recent Blogs
Recent Infographics
Recent Case Studies
Featured Case Study
ComplianceQuest Medical Devices QMS Success Stories eBook
Recent Checklists
Featured Checklist
Complaint Handling Process for MedTech and Life Science Companies
Course Offerings
Recent CQ Guides
Datasheets
Brochures
Demo Center
Videos
Podcasts
Recent Webinars
Webinar
Unlocking the Value of Complaints
Recent Whitepapers
Whitepaper
Why You Need to Digitally Transform Your QMS
Compliance
Toolkits
Infographic
Safety Technology Trends to Watch in 2023 (Infographic)
Recent Toolkits
Events and Webinars
Events
Upcoming Webinars
Featured Event
42nd SQA Annual Meeting
13 Apr, 2026
National Harbor, MD
About
About ComplianceQuest
Transform to a fully connected business with a next-generation AI-powered Product Lifecycle, Quality, Safety, and Supplier management platform, built on Salesforce.
Our connected suite of solutions helps businesses of all sizes increase quality, safety and efficiency as they bring their products from concept to customer success.
Meet the Leadership Team
Careers
Where Your Career Takes Flight: Join our dynamic team and be part of an innovative, collaborative and rewarding workplace culture.
Corporate Citizenship
Impact Through Action: How the ComplianceQuest team supports social causes and community engagement
Customers & Testimonials
Newsroom
The Pulse of ComplianceQuest: Our newsroom shares stories of innovation, progress, and change
Partners
Stronger Together: How our partnerships drive success and innovation
Upcoming Events
In one of our earlier CQ Guides, we spoke about the importance of garnering insights from complaints data to improve quality metrics in the medical device industry. In this post – as part of our Medical Device Quality series – we’ll talk about streamlining the process of reporting adverse events to the FDA, especially in scenarios where the no. of e-MDRs that get submitted is fairly high.
Roger is the Vice President of Quality & Regulatory Affairs (QA/RA) at an exciting medical device company. He manages a wonderful team of regulatory, quality and compliance professionals to ensure each of the company’s products, services and internal processes comply with all relevant laws, regulations and standards.
But currently, he is grappling with a major challenge – one that is taking up a lot of his time.
He needs to figure out a better way to submit e-MDRs or electronic versions (XML files) of MedWatch information (reports of adverse events) to the FDA.
He didn’t have this issue with the company’s first product, because the number of eMDR submissions was less than 50 per month. Now, the company’s second product is a consumer-based device which is waiting for final FDA approval and the quality leaders expects the volume of eMDRs to be submitted anywhere between 3000 to 8000 every month.
It is a process that is cumbersome, inefficient and resource expensive. The quality leader – after consulting with his compliance team and other quality analysts – decides to evaluate alternatives and collaborates with the IT team to come up with a solution.
Both the quality leaders as well the head of IT realize the importance of collaborating with each other to a simple way to submit e-MDRs.
Roger – the quality leader – starts with the fundamentals, just to make sure his IT team understands the importance of this.
It refers to electronic-Medical Device Report. It consists of sending electronic versions of MedWatch information (reports of adverse events) to the FDA. MedWatch is the FDA program that collects adverse events data coming from healthcare professionals and consumers.
Since August 2015, the FDA no longer accepts paper or emailed pdf reports. Medical device manufacturers and importers are required to submit MDRs to the FDA in an electronic format that the FDA can process, review, and analyze.
Typically, a U.S. based medical device company submits anywhere between 50 to 10,000 MDRs a month depending on the types of products it manufactures and the volume that is sold. The process is both time-consuming and labor-intensive.
Moreover, regulatory bodies in other countries are expanding to allow e-MDR submissions as well such as EU MIR reporting into the Eudamed database.
Currently, there are two ways for medical device companies to submit e-MDRs to the FDA’s electronic submissions gateway (ESG);
Option #1: Submit e-MDRs through the FDA ESG WebTrader Interface application. In this case, the process is manual and files are submitted via the app.
Option #2: Submit e-MDRs through FDA ESG AS2 Gateway into the FDA ESG database. This requires an Applicability Statement 2 submission system. The system must generate an HL-7 XML file and this process is automated.
Of course, there are challenges with both options.
Here are the steps that a customer (that uses a modern EQMS like ComplianceQuest) would have to take in order to submit an e-MDR using WebTrader.
Now, with the right solution, all these steps can be replaced with the click of a button through the automated process of the MDR e-Gateway. But, more on that later.
Overall, using WebTrader is inefficient and manual. Specifically, these are the disadvantages:
To put it simply, using Automated AS2 is costly and complicated. It’s difficult to build a submissions system for the following reasons:
They go deeper to document the pains and needs of both the regulatory and IT teams.
Pain points for the Regulatory Team
The Need: An efficient solution that reduces the need for more people, while also ensuring compliance. It must also be a solution that provides visibility to the regulatory and quality team.
Pain points for the IT Team
The Need: A simple, cloud-based solution that reduces IT costs and the need for resources.
Overall, the requirement was clear. Both quality and IT leaders want an e-MDR submission solution that offers:
Let’s talk about some of the major advantages of CQ’s MDR e-Gateway:
Advantage #1:
With CQ’s MDR e-Gateway, clients can submit their MedWatch reports with the click of a button and automatically get updates on the status of their submissions.
Key Benefits:
Advantage #2:
Complaint reports that are prepared within CQ are submitted automatically once a day at a time specified by the customer. Users also have the option to submit individual reports immediately.
Advantage #3:
Customers automatically receive important acknowledgements generated by the FDA after they submit their report, and the relevant documents are also automatically generated.
CQ’s gateway delivers the following acknowledgements:
Advantage #4:
The e-MDR Gateway also comes with reports and dashboards so that the regulatory teams can keep track of all their submissions and get key insights into their performance.
If you are looking for an easier and efficient way for e-MDR filing then look no further. ComplianceQuest’s MDR eGateway can be the perfect solution for you.
To know more, request for a demo here: https://www.compliancequest.com/online-demo
Everyone at Candelis uses ComplianceQuest to some extent. Whether it’s via remote access or in the office, we take care of all of our quality requirements through the platform.
I was excited about the things we could do to work faster and smarter. Everything is better organized and there are more customization options. The best thing you can hope for is a seamless upgrade, and that’s exactly what we experienced.
I am really impressed with the ComplianceQuest dashboard because I can customize it exactly the way I want and every employee can do the same.
- Larry Collie, Quality Systems Manager, Candelis Inc.
Please confirm your details
By submitting this form you agree that we can store and process your personal data as per our Privacy Statement. We will never sell your personal information to any third party.
Enter Captcha